Selected Universal Health Systems Compared With the United States
Comparison of healthcare spending, workforce, core coverage and system structure. International spending levels are descriptive comparisons, not estimates of what the United States would spend under another country's system.
Germany
Netherlands
Australia
United Kingdom
| Country | Coverage Model | Spending Per Capita (USD PPP) | Share of GDP | Doctors / 1,000 | Nurses / 1,000 | Core Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Mixed public/private multipayer | $14,885 | 17.2% | 2.7 | 12.4 | 93% |
| Germany | Statutory health insurance + private insurance | $9,365 | 12.3% | 4.7 | 12.2 | 100% |
| Netherlands | Mandatory regulated competing insurance | $8,436 | 10.0% | 3.9 | 11.1 | 100% |
| Australia | Universal public Medicare + private insurance | $7,469 | 10.3% | 4.2 | 13.0 | 100% |
| United Kingdom | Tax-funded National Health Service | $6,747 | 11.1% | 3.4 | 9.1 | 100% |
Notes
Cross-country spending figures are adjusted using purchasing-power parities. They should not be multiplied by the U.S. population to estimate the cost of adopting another country's system. Countries differ in demographics, prices, benefits, provider payment, workforce, long-term care and accounting conventions. Core coverage also describes entitlement to a core set of services and does not imply identical benefits or zero cost sharing.
Sources
[533]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Health at a Glance 2025: OECD Indicators
[535]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Health at a Glance 2025: Germany
[536]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Health at a Glance 2025: Netherlands
[537]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Health at a Glance 2025: Australia
[538]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Health at a Glance 2025: United Kingdom